就《哈利波特》系列丛书本身来说如何评价罗琳将邓布利多对格林德沃的感情设定为爱情？

就《哈利波特》系列丛书本身来说如何评价罗琳将邓布利多对格林德沃的感情设定为爱情？

1. 其实通读全书，作者明着暗着讨论人权，平权，反歧视这些费了很多笔墨，所以系列的top hero之一设为同性恋蛮好理解的。另外注意下老邓的职业严格来讲是老师，现实中直到现在还有很多人在吵LGBT老师对学生是否有不良影响。所以从这本书更宏大的角度出发，这个设定简直合情合理，甚至天经地义。

2. 人无完人，所以前6本书既然描述了这么个上帝一般的人，最后一本书一定要把他humanize. 所以他有过一个很不完美的家庭，一段很不完美的...... well, 我个人还是认为这是单恋，JKR的采访我记得也说的是Grindelwald didn't reciprocate, 但是等Fantastic Beasts系列拍完再说吧，我不知道她打不打算为了腐市场整点什么出来。伟大如邓布利多也曾爱上过一个混蛋然后为爱情瞎了眼，然后走上过歪路，然后毁了自己家庭，我知道有些人就看见一个道貌岸然实际有不可见人的过去的伪君子，but I see an inspiring story of growth, change, and redemption.

所以这怎么降低了思想高度？？？我怎么觉得提高了？？？

3. 其实Grindelwald的支线剧情交代的不仅是老邓的human past吧...... 还有类似于why he never seeked power之类的事情。

4. 瞻仰一下那封信吧：

Gellert —

Your point about Wizard dominance being FOR THE MUGGLES’ OWN GOOD — this, I think, is the crucial point. Yes, we have been given power and yes, that power gives us the right to rule, but it also gives us responsibilities over the ruled. We must stress this point, it will be the foundation stone upon which we build. Where we are opposed, as we surely will be, this must be the basis of all our counterarguments. We seize control FOR THE GREATER GOOD. And from this it follows that where we meet resistance, we must use only the force that is necessary and no more. (This was your mistake at Durmstrang! But I do not complain, because if you had not been expelled, we would never have met.)

Albus

其实我觉得即使这时候Grindelwald跟Dumbledore对所谓统治麻瓜的政治观念也不太一样，老邓提到的像responsibility, use only the force that is necessary and no more这些东西，都代表他对power的认识和Grindelwald还是有区别的。

5. 我个人觉得... given Albus's boyhood, he had a valid reason to dislike the Secrecy law... Arianna八成是个obscurus。Actually, correct that, Arianna was 100% an obscurus. 所以因为几个麻瓜还有那个保密法，他的妹妹成了obscurus, 爸爸坐了牢后来死了，妈妈被妹妹误杀，弟弟荒废了学业，自己困在家里当保姆不能出去实现自己的梦想和价值... 总之可以理解。